It did not take long for Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) to surface among unhinged leftists in the United States and across the globe, with critics of Donald Trump screaming, sobbing, and snarling at the president-elect’s clear-cut victory over abortion extremist Kamala Harris on November 5.
Notably, Trump critics and those of their ilk do strange things, including stating their support for the 4B movement, a feminist campaign that started in Korea in the late 2010s after the “Me Too” movement. (For the uninitiated, the four Bs refer to bi-hon (no marriage), bi-yeonae (no dating), bi-chulsan (no birthing) and bi-sex (no sex).)
According to NBC News, many American women unhappy with Trump’s win have published videos on TikTok declaring their plans to join the 4B trend in their own ways, decrying men for voting for Trump and allegedly being “anti-women” (more precisely, those who did not vote Trump accused Trump voters for being “anti-women” by refusing to elect the baby-killing Harris).
With a touch of twisted “logic”, proponents of the 4B movement hope that by reducing marriage and birth rates, men who voted for Trump would somehow be persuaded to safeguard the “right” of women to kill their unborn babies.
As per the typical Marxist playbook labeling targets as “oppressors” and selves as “victims”, the American 4B movement in short contends that pro-life candidates and policies (admittedly Trump is not as pro-life as some of his supporters make him out to be) undermine and suppress women’s “right” to unfettered abortion access. Pro-life politicians and policies, many of whom are men, have been castigated as “oppressors” of women’s “rights”.
Thus, members of the abortion cult have decried these pro-life men as women’s “oppressors”, deserving of punishment or worse.
Enter the 4B movement, which feminists and anti-life advocates view as a means to penalize their male “oppressors”. One TikToker even posted that she is participating in the 4B movement after breaking up with her Republican boyfriend.
With a touch of twisted “logic”, proponents of the 4B movement hope that by reducing marriage and birth rates, men who voted for Trump would somehow be persuaded to safeguard the “right” of women to kill their unborn babies. Apparently, by not having children, women would supposedly be “happier” and more “liberated” (even the Russian government considers such thinking “extremist”).
We do live in a topsy-turvy world, don’t we?
There were men who voted for Trump precisely because of the extremist Biden-Harris administration’s efforts to undermine the safety of women in sports and public restrooms.
Interestingly, we must not be too quick to dismiss the 4B movement as a monolithic one. After all, women have their reasons to abstain from dating and relations with men (though not all of these reasons are necessarily justified). Some women, for instance, have correctly pointed out that hookup culture and “situationships” have been deleterious for women, and it’s high time to address this pressing issue.
Nonetheless, the existence of cads among males does not mean that all men are bad, as this woman claims. While I commiserate with the bad experiences this woman has had with jerks, it would be an overgeneralization to conclude that all men are evil.
It is not the solution for all women to abstain from relations or interactions with all men, just because of a handful of unprincipled scoundrels. (The silver lining in the 4B movement is that the number of instances of extramarital sex will drop, thus reducing fornicating women’s impulses to seek abortions to kill their babies.)
What is more, many men who voted for Trump did so not because they regarded women as inferior, but because they wanted to protect the safety of the women around them, including family members, loved ones, and friends.
There were men who voted for Trump simply because they wanted their borders secure and preventable killings stopped once and for all.
There were men who voted for Trump precisely because of the extremist Biden-Harris administration’s efforts to undermine the safety of women in sports and public restrooms.
There were men who voted for Trump primarily to ensure that unborn baby girls can get a chance at life if the anti-life Harris were to become president.
There were men who voted for Trump simply because they wanted their borders secure and preventable killings (like that of Georgia nursing student Laken Riley’s) stopped once and for all.
Besides, the despicable porn industry, already notable for its objectification of women, spent hundreds of thousands of ads supporting Harris, and not Trump. (So, who are the real “oppressors” of women here?)
Rather than simply disparage male voters for electing Trump, like this unhappy Harris supporter here on The Conversation, feminists and their sycophants should do some soul-searching as to why many males voted for Trump.
Democrats have been so out of touch with the ground that they thought by merely championing “abortion” and LGBTQ+ issues, Harris could win the presidential election.
For too long already, Harris and other baby-killing fanatics have touted the blatant lie that abortion is “healthcare”, as “healthcare” cannot involve the intentional destruction of another innocent human being.
Democrats have been so out of touch with the ground that they thought by merely championing “abortion” and LGBTQ+ issues, Harris could win the presidential election.
The Democrat delusion of getting Hollywood celebrities to pose alongside a “joyful” Harris as a political strategy to strike a chord with ordinary Americans clearly did not work.
The Democrat hallucination in this past election campaign was that promoting tampons on boys’ bathrooms was a more pressing issue than the faltering state of the American economy and rising gas prices.
Thanks be to God and the Blessed Virgin Mary, despite all the Democrat shenanigans of trying to get Harris elected, American voters knew better on Election Day.
