Invalid Input

Invalid Input

Search the Remnant Newspaper
Monday, May 9, 2022

Remaining Faithful in an Era of Globalism

Written by  JP
Rate this item
(19 votes)
Remaining Faithful in an Era of Globalism

Lawfulness seems to be the driving force behind the military’s mandate to receive the COVID-1984 vaccine.  It is not a vaccine to fight off the SARS-CoV-2/Coronavirus.  Neither is it a vaccine developed to target the perpetual variants of this, statistically speaking, nonlethal virus, concerning the military’s healthy, “unvaccinated”, service members.  Yet, the leaders of these healthy service members, the healthy soldiers between the ages of 18-85 whom face a less than 1% death rate from the hystericized virus, have deemed it necessary to mandate the unsafe and inefficient COVID-1984 vaccination.  Mandated against its service members who do not consent to be experimented upon, and who prefer to develop a safer, and more efficient, natural immunity, through their God given immune system.  The same immune system that every vaccine depends upon for its fraudulent claims of efficacy.  The consequences for disobeying an immoral lawful order have caused many intimidated soldiers to follow the footsteps of the old Adam.


Health care providers are required by law to report adverse reactions to the vaccines they administer.  They are expected to report the numerous adverse reactions associated with each vaccine, and are even lawfully ordered to report a much narrower selection of adverse reactions, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).  Unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of medical care providers do not report adverse reactions.  They remain willfully ignorant of their lawful obligation to report certain events and are unaware of the multiplicity of adverse reactions that they are “encouraged” to monitor and report. 

It should be no surprise that this reality is the intended result of the corrupt process that was extorted into law by the evil pharmaceutical industry. 

It should be no surprise that this reality is the intended result of the corrupt process that was extorted into law by the evil pharmaceutical industry.  This corruption was confirmed in 2007 when U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) paid Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (HPHC) one million dollars to assess the effectiveness of the lawfully mandated VAERS vaccine safety data.  HPHC reported that VAERS fails to capture over 99% of adverse reactions from vaccines.  HPHC offered to establish an automated system that could improve VAERS from being ineffective to actually offering an effective collection of vaccine adverse event data.  HHS declined to implement an automated solution because the failure of VAERS is the willful ignorance required to maintain the incestuous relationship between the deceitful medical industry and its prostituted governments.  It is not surprising that medical providers remain unaware of their legal obligations to submit reports to VAERS.  The same immoral medical establishment, that was built upon the foundation of Satan’s pharmaceutical industry, that controls the medical schools which intentionally neglect to educate future medical care providers about the dangers of vaccines, is the same immoral institution that controls corrupt government leaders to proselytize unholy vaccinations.  The cult of vaccine fundamentalists willfully ignores the valid problems with their Godless religion. 

The list of adverse reactions for the anthrax vaccine is a revealing indictment of the career minded leadership that maintains a shameful disregard for the welfare of service members which they assume responsibility for.  These chronic, and in many cases: lethal, vaccine injuries amount to a description of Gulf War Syndrome (GWS).  The pharmaceutical industry’s incestuous control of the deadly medical establishment, corrupt government, cultural indoctrination, and media prostitutes, has allowed for this evil institution to exploit, harm, and even murder, the most vulnerable.  No longer able to prey upon the incarcerated, the mental institutions, the colonized, thanks to the advocacy of those who concern themselves with these vulnerable populations, the military and the unborn remain their convenient victims.  Having no protectors to safeguard their health from the predatorial, Big Pharma agenda, their bodies remain at the mercy of the latest “medical” poison that Big Pharma wishes to inject them with.  In a haste to cash in on the anthrax elixir, prior to the attack on an enemy with supposed “chemical weapons of mass destruction”, the pharmaceutical industry recklessly replaced their toxic covalent with another toxic covalent that was toxic enough to expedite the precious antibody response that is essential to their snake-oil-shell-game.  

Many soldiers who were injured by the anthrax vaccine were intentionally persecuted, and disgracefully discharged, by military leadership, in order to further conceal their abuse of power through the anthrax vaccine program.

Several peer reviewed, published studies, have established the association between the anthrax vaccine and GWS.  Incoherently, Veterans must establish their physical presence in the Gulf region to receive disability compensation from this dishonest, arbitrary accounting of the unexplained GWS illnesses.  Though depleted uranium and exposure to harmful toxins may account for a fraction of the soldiers who suffer from GWS disabilities, there still remains a countless toll of GWS service members who have no connection to this politically preferred narrative.  Along with ignoring the relevant scientific studies, the requirement of Gulf region presence ignores the fact that none of the “unvaccinated” allies and “unvaccinated”, imbedded reporters, whom were exposed to the exact same Gulf War environment that the countless “vaccinated” soldiers were exposed to have any reported cases of Gulf War Syndrome.  American, Canadian, and British soldiers, who were lawfully ordered to receive the anthrax vaccine, happen to be the expendable subjects who suffer from GWS.  Those soldiers who suffer from GWS, without having met the requirement of established presence in the Gulf region, are discarded without compensation for their vaccine injuries.  What’s worse, many soldiers who were injured by the anthrax vaccine were intentionally persecuted, and disgracefully discharged, by military leadership, in order to further conceal their abuse of power through the anthrax vaccine program.[1]  Perhaps, one day, our society may recognize the similarities between Vietnam Veterans who were harmed by Agent Orange and the soldiers who have suffered from the vaccine gold rush that took place after 1986.[2]

The denial of religious exemptions is the predetermined result of dishonest and incompetent, obedient, religious exemption arbitrators.  The message has been loud and clear to service members with sincere exemption requests.  It is a message that has been consistently delivered by leaders, who likely received the lawful mantra in their obedient leaders’ meetings, unaware of the evil guilt they are confessing to.  The message is, don’t get your hopes up if you submit an exemption request because if you do bother to submit such a request, your doomed to fail request will be denied.  When this message was pointed out to such a leader, the response was that a religious exemption request was equivalent to a lottery ticket.  I’m not saying don’t buy a lottery ticket but I am saying that your request has no worldly value and is surely expected to lose.  Those soldiers who refuse to participate in the death cult of the murder-derived-vaccine industry, remain resolute in their commitment to being faithful.  This resolve exists in a world far apart from the success of a lottery ticket.  The only treasure to be won is a crown of heaven that often includes the straight and narrow road of redemptive suffering.     

Sincere religious exemption requests, and even righteous philosophical objections to sinful vaccines, are more authoritative than the lawful obedience of damned fools. 

Many goats in leaders clothing fail to acknowledge that sincere religious exemption requests, from soldiers who refuse to participate in the murder-stained vaccine industry, are committed to honoring their oath of defending the constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic, and, most importantly, are convicted to remain faithful and true in their relationship with God.  Their loyalty to God supersedes every other allegiance on this side of heaven.  Every knee must bow on earth and in heaven to the King of kings, and only damned fools remain willfully ignorant of this eternal justice.  This is the binding authority of the oaths we swear to.  The same God that the service members pledged an oath to.  The same oath that is appealed to when those shallow leaders invoke the authority of lawful orders.  Though Caesar must receive what belongs to Caesar, everyone, including Caesar, must submit to the authority of God above all else.  Sincere religious exemption requests, and even righteous philosophical objections to sinful vaccines, are more authoritative than the lawful obedience of damned fools. 

My particular religious exemption request, from murder derived vaccination, was something that I have twice attempted to be processed well over a year prior to any discussion of an available COVID-1984 vaccine.  My religious exemption request is, and has always been, based from a sincere religious conviction that it is a grave evil to participate in the murder-derived-vaccine industry.  When I first became aware of Satan’s most unholy antisacrament I was immediately opposed to its grave evil.  It is not enough to be an “anti-vaxxer.”  To live in Christ, demands vaccine abolition.  Participation in this Satanic industry is absolutely incompatible with a holy life in Christ that is set apart from the culture of death.  As for me and my family, we abolish Satan’s rotten fruit from our communion with God Almighty, the source of life in heaven and on earth.

The rejection of my religious exemption request is not only a rejection of my religious beliefs, it is a rejection of my God.  The same God that I pledged an oath to is the God that the military has deemed unwelcome.  In denying my religious bond, the military has denied the God I am bound to.  Thus, the true meaning of the oath sworn is made void.  Their unGodly authority is null, regarding the salvation of my soul.  If the redemptive suffering of the military’s persecutions is the divine providence of God, then may God grant me the strength to conform to His will and conform to His will as I remain obligated to disobey the evil orders of my obedient leaders

Personal religious conviction should compel every Christian to abstain from any cooperation, direct or “indirect”, with the murder of innocents.

All those belonging to Christ must refuse COVID-19 vaccination and all vaccines derived from aborted fetal cells, either at any point in their development or in their final product.  The following is a list of vaccines, within the United States, that are presently associated with the grave sin of abortion:

Acute Respiratory (aborted fetal cell lines: WI-38 / HEK-293), Chickenpox (aborted fetal cell lines: WI-38 / MRC-5), COVID-19 (aborted fetal cell lines: PER.C6 / HEK-293), Ebola (aborted fetal cell lines: HEK-293 / PER.C6), Hepatitis A / Hepatitis A & B / Hepatitis A & Typhoid (aborted fetal cell line: MRC-5), Infection Prevention (aborted fetal cell line: HEK-293), Measles-Mumps-Rubella (aborted fetal cell lines: RA273 / WI-38 / MRC-5), Measles-Rubella (aborted fetal cell lines: RA273 / WI-38 / MRC-5), Mumps-Rubella (aborted fetal cell lines: RA273 / WI-38), Rubella (aborted fetal cell lines: RA273 / WI-38), MMR & Chickenpox (aborted fetal cell lines: RA273 / WI-38 / MRC-5), Rabies (aborted fetal cell line: MRC-5), Shingles (aborted fetal cell lines: WI-38 / MRC-5), Smallpox (aborted fetal cell line: MRC-5).

Upon being informed of the grave evil relating to vaccine development, a well-formed conscience cannot accept any vaccine that has any association with the murder of an unborn child.  Sacred Scripture, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, Church Councils, papal encyclicals, the October 12, 2021 Statement from the Archbishop for the U.S. Military Services, my parish priest, and my membership of the Catholic organization: the Confraternity of Our Lady of Fatima, under the guidance of Bishop Athanasius Schneider, supports the righteous dissent against vaccines associated with abortion on the basis of the invincible, morally formed conscience. 

Personal religious belief, within the true religion of Traditional Catholicism, remains an unshakable preventative against direct, complicit participation with any golden vaccines that are associated with the grave sin of abortion.  Vaccines involving aborted fetal cells, either in their research, development, or final product, in one way or another, all employ cell lines derived from the evil murder of children.  Personal religious conviction should compel every Christian to abstain from any cooperation, direct or “indirect”, with the murder of innocents.[3]

The Catholic Church teaches that “vaccination is not, as a rule, a moral obligation and that, therefore, it must be voluntary.” 

The Catholic Church teaches that “vaccination is not, as a rule, a moral obligation and that, therefore, it must be voluntary.”  Thus, the Catholic Church teaches that individuals must not be forced to take a COVID-19 vaccine.[4]

The Confraternity of Our Lady of Fatima, under the guidance of Bishop Athanasius Schneider who, on this issue of conscience, has come down against any use of the available abortion-derived vaccines because it would be sinful to cooperate, even “indirectly”, in the crime of abortion.[5]

Even if a morally convicted, religious individual was not Catholic, their personal religious belief should be the same as the Traditionally Catholic minded individual, regarding murder-derived-vaccines.  Each and every righteously religious individual should not have anything to do with vaccines that are connected in any way to the act of abortion.  A well-formed conscience does not allow anyone to comply with the immoral injection of a murder-derived-vaccine.[6]

Vaccines propagated on aborted fetal cell lines such as, MMR (measles, mumps, rubella), Hepatitis-A, Varicella (chickenpox), COVID-19 vaccines, and every vaccine past, present and future, that use the remains of murdered children, are morally unacceptable.  Along with the grave sin of murder, there remains several serious sins that are inescapably linked to the intrinsically evil vaccines that are associated with abortion:

“To conclude, as some have, that there is only mediate remote material cooperation in abortion by the vaccine recipient is a red herring.  It shifts emphasis away from the specific moral character of possessing and using the cell line itself toward “historical association” with the original abortion, obscuring the central problem while even causing it to go unnamed.  The recipient is an immediate participant in the commission of continuous theft of human remains obtained through deliberate killing, their desecration through exploitation and trafficking, as well as ultimate omission to respectfully bury them.  While the original killing establishes the illicit character of using the remains, their possession and use becomes a distinct evil in itself, the circumstances of which do not cease as a form of theft, desecration, exploitation, and refusal to bury, regardless of the consumer’s distance in time from the abortion, or the number of cell divisions, or the merely sub-cellular fragmentary inclusion of the child’s DNA and protein in the final dose”  (Fr. Michael Copenhagen, Restore Ye to Its Owners: on the immorality of receiving vaccines derived from abortion).  

Further, the Church teaching on Social Justice upholds the belief that using products from manufacturers engaged in aborted fetal research and murder-derived-vaccine production is wrong from both a personal and a societal perspective.

In addition, vaccines such as Gardasil and Hepatitis-B are designed to prevent diseases that are known to be transmitted among sexually promiscuous people and illicit IV drug users.  We are commanded by God to behave in a moral manner as He instructs us.  The use of any vaccine that protects against illicit behavior directly contradicts God’s laws.

Further, the Church teaching on Social Justice upholds the belief that using products from manufacturers engaged in aborted fetal research and murder-derived-vaccine production is wrong from both a personal and a societal perspective.  Not only does it violate Catholic teaching on the grave sin of abortion and aborted fetal research, the use of these products also provides capital dollars for the industry to continue these practices, as evidenced by current clinical trials of Ebola and other vaccines which are using aborted fetal cell lines. 

Social justice can never be attained when society submits itself to the depravity of using the remains of murdered children for personal benefit or worse, corporate profit.  It would be a direct violation of conscience to purchase any products from these companies and in direct contradiction to the teachings founded in Traditional Catholic faith.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) contains the tenets of the Traditional Catholic faith and the Catholic individual’s duty to adhere to conscience:

1776   “Deep within his conscience man discovers a law which he has not laid upon himself but which he must obey. Its voice, ever calling him to love and to do what is good and to avoid evil, sounds in his heart at the right moment.... For man has in his heart a law inscribed by God.... His conscience is man’s most secret core and his sanctuary. There he is alone with God whose voice echoes in his depths.”

1777    Moral conscience, present at the heart of the person, enjoins him at the appropriate moment to do good and to avoid evil. It also judges particular choices, approving those that are good and denouncing those that are evil. It bears witness to the authority of truth in reference to the supreme Good to which the human person is drawn, and it welcomes the commandments. When he listens to his conscience, the prudent man can hear God speaking.

1778    Conscience is a judgment of reason whereby the human person recognizes the moral quality of a concrete act that he is going to perform, is in the process of performing, or has already completed. In all he says and does, man is obliged to follow faithfully what he knows to be just and right. It is by the judgment of his conscience that man perceives and recognizes the prescriptions of the divine law:

Conscience is a law of the mind; yet Christians would not grant that it is nothing more; I mean that it was not a dictate, nor conveyed the notion of responsibility, of duty, of a threat and a promise.... Conscience is a messenger of him, who, both in nature and in grace, speaks to us behind a veil, and teaches and rules us by his representatives. Conscience is the aboriginal Vicar of Christ.

1779    It is important for every person to be sufficiently present to himself in order to hear and follow the voice of his conscience. This requirement of interiority is all the more necessary as life often distracts us from any reflection, self-examination or introspection. Return to your conscience, question it.... Turn inward, brethren, and in everything you do, see God as your witness.

There has remained consistent support, within Traditional Catholic teaching, that conscience is the Divine Law which is inscribed into the heart and soul of man by God.  For example:

“The natural law is written and engraved in the soul of each and every man, because it is human reason, ordaining him to do good and forbidding him to sin...But this command of human reason would not have the force of law if it were not the voice and interpreter of a higher reason to which our spirit and freedom must be submitted.” (Leo XIII Libertas Praestantissimum, 597)

On his part, man perceives and acknowledges the imperatives of the divine law through the mediation of conscience. It is through his conscience that man sees and recognizes the demands of divine law. He is bound to follow this conscience faithfully in all his activity so that he may come to God, who is his last end. Therefore he must not be forced to act contrary to his conscience. Nor must he be prevented from acting according to his conscience, especially in religious matters.  The reason is that the exercise of religion, of its very nature, consists before all else in those internal, voluntary and free acts whereby man sets the course of his life directly toward God. Acts of this kind cannot be commanded or forbidden by any merely human authority.” (Dignitatis Humanae, Pope Paul VI, 1965)

"In accordance with their dignity, all human beings, because they are persons, that is, beings endowed with reason and free will and, therefore, bearing a personal responsibility, are both impelled by their nature and bound by a moral obligation to seek the truth, especially religious truth. They are also bound to adhere to the truth once they come to know it and to direct their whole lives in accordance with its demands" (Dignitatis Humanae, 2). "The practice of religion by its very nature consists primarily of those voluntary and free internal acts of conscience by which a human being directly sets his course towards God. No merely human power can either command or prohibit acts of this kind" (Synod of Bishops' address to the United Nations October 2, 1979)

"For its part, authentic freedom is an exceptional sign of the Divine image within man. For God has willed that man remain "under the control of his own decisions, so that he can seek his Creator spontaneously, and come freely to utter and blissful perfection through loyalty to Him. Hence man's dignity demands that he act according to a knowing and free choice that is personally motivated and prompted from within, not under blind internal impulse nor by mere external pressure.” (Pope Paul VI, 1965 Gaudium et Spes)

"The Divine Law," says Cardinal Gousset, "is the supreme rule of actions; our thoughts, desires, words, acts, all that man is, is subject to the domain of the law of God; and this law is the rule of our conduct by means of our conscience. Hence it is never lawful to go against our conscience; as the Fourth Lateran council says, 'Quid fit contra conscientiam, aedificat ad gehennam.' ["Whatever is done in opposition to conscience is conducive to damnation."]” (Fourth Lateran Council)

Statement on Coronavirus Vaccines and the Sanctity of Conscience, Archbishop for the U.S. Military Services Timothy P. Broglio, 12 October 2021:

On 24 August 2021, the Secretary of Defense issued a memorandum directing the mandatory vaccination of all services members against COVID-19. Since then, some service members have refused to take the vaccine and have requested a religious accommodation through the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

This circumstance raises the question of whether the vaccine’s moral permissibility precludes an individual from forming a sincerely held religious belief that receiving the vaccine would violate his conscience. It does not…

Accordingly, no one should be forced to receive a COVID-19 vaccine if it would violate the sanctity of his or her conscience.

Individuals possess the ‘civil right not to be hindered in leading their lives in accordance with their consciences.’ Even if an individual’s decision seems erroneous or inconsistent to others, conscience does not lose its dignity. This belief permeates Catholic moral theology as well as First Amendment jurisprudence. As stated by the United States Supreme Court, ‘[R]eligious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection.’

The denial of religious accommodations, or punitive or adverse personnel actions taken against those who raise earnest, conscience-based objections, would be contrary to federal law and morally reprehensible.”  

And finally, as Sacred Scripture and the wisdom of St. Thomas Aquinas states:

The kingdom of God is within.” (Luke 17:21)

“Everyone who knows what is the right thing to do and doesn’t do it commits a sin” (James 4:17)

“If we sin after receiving the truth judgment remains.” (Hebrews 10: 26-27).

“It is better to perish in excommunication than to violate one’s conscience.” (St. Thomas Aquinas).

In that the use of vaccines associated with abortion, and the accumulative sins that develop from the illicit use of aborted fetal cells, would be a violation of both Scripture and Catholic Doctrine on the duty to adhere to moral conscience, therefore, under the laws of the Catholic Church to which each and every loyal Catholics is religiously and morally bound, I remain incapable of consenting to receive them.  My personal religious belief forms my moral conscience and forbids me from receiving any of the currently available, or future vaccines, to include the COVID-19 vaccine, that are associated with the grave sin of abortion, which I cannot condone and in which I cannot participate in any way.

It is the shame of unmanly shepherds that their sheep are left to fend off the wolves with the mediate, remote, mediocre endorsement of moral conscience, should these faithful sheep, have the courageous fortitude to wield it against the death cult of Satan’s kingdom. 

It is my strong conviction that I am unable to fulfill my call to leadership, within and beyond my military service, if I consider the accepted legal conclusions of others above my moral conscience. 

It is the shame of unmanly shepherds that their sheep are left to fend off the wolves with the mediate, remote, mediocre endorsement of moral conscience, should these faithful sheep, have the courageous fortitude to wield it against the death cult of Satan’s kingdom. 

Thanks be to God, even when unfaithful servants fail to lead, Christ remains King. 

Thy will be done.

The Latest at RTV — A PAPAL ONE-EIGHTY ON UKRAINE: On World War III & Pro-Abort Threats


[1] Vaccine Epidemic, edited by Louise Kuo Habakus, Mary Holland, and Kim Mack Rosenberg, reveals first-hand accounts of the anthrax vaccine campaign and exposes Operation Bronze Anvil – a shameful, internal operation, of military leaders, intended to remove vaccine injured soldiers from the military, dishonorably, in order to conceal the injustice committed against them.

[2] Vaccine A, written by Gary Matsumoto, reveals how the military’s vaccination program has often failed its Service Members.   

[3] Included but not limited to the following COVID-19 vaccines: Johnson & Johnson/Janssen: Fetal cell cultures are used to produce and manufacture the J&J COVID-19 vaccine and the final formulation of this vaccine includes residual amounts of the fetal host cell proteins (≤0.15 mcg) and/or host cell DNA (≤3 ng).  Pfizer/BioNTech: The HEK-293 abortion-related cell line was used in research related to the development of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.  Moderna/NIAID: Aborted fetal cell lines were used in both the development and testing of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine.

[4] See “Note on the morality of using some anti-Covid-19 vaccines,” CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, December 21, 2020: icovid_en.html (accessed August 17, 2021).

[5] See The crime of abortion is so monstrous that any kind of concatenation with this crime, even a very remote one, is immoral and cannot be accepted under any circumstances by a Catholic once he has become fully aware of it. One who uses these vaccines must realize that his body is benefitting from the “fruits” (although steps removed through a series of chemical processes) of one of mankind’s greatest crimes. Any link to the abortion process, even the most remote and implicit, will cast a shadow over the Church’s duty to bear unwavering witness to the truth that abortion must be utterly rejected. The ends cannot justify the means. 

See also affidavit of membership in the Confraternity of Our Lady of Fatima.

[6] As the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s Guidance on the protection of sincere religious beliefs states, it does not matter whether one’s sincere religious belief happens to correspond to that of any denomination or that it might even contradict the teaching of one’s denomination. What matters is that one has a sincere religious belief, which I do, concerning the immorality of recourse to abortion-derived vaccines. To quote the EEOC’s Guidance document in the Code of Federal Regulations:

            The fact that no religious group espouses such beliefs or 

            the fact that the religious group to which the individual 

            professes to belong may not accept such belief will not 

            determine whether the belief is a religious belief of the

            employee or prospective employee….

Also, I am aware that the United States Supreme Court has held that “[W]e reject the notion that to claim the protection of the Free Exercise Clause, one must be responding to the commands of a particular religious organization.” Frazee v. Illinois Dept. of Emp. Sec., 489 U.S. 829, 834, 109 S. Ct. 1514, 1517–18, 103 L. Ed. 2d 914 (1989) (emphasis added). In other words, it is the law of the land that my personal religious belief against vaccination does not have to be supported by any particular religious organization, not even the Church to which I belong. I do not have to show that any particular religion positively forbids me to take a COVID-19 vaccine. My personal religious belief forbids me.

[Comment Guidelines - Click to view]
Last modified on Monday, May 9, 2022