Invalid Input

Invalid Input

Search the Remnant Newspaper

Kathy Clubb | Australian Correspondent

After a turbulent week in Melbourne, Catholics again turned out in force for a public Rosary procession, joining a huge Freedom rally that saw a total of more than 50,000 march against vaccine mandates and COVID tyranny.

For the third week in a row, a group of Catholics from all over Greater Melbourne processed from St. Patrick’s Cathedral to Parliament House, praying the Rosary and singing hymns. The group which began with only 60 members reached ten times that number in the second week, while more than 700 attended last Saturday’s rally.

This is how Catholics fight tyranny: Public Rosaries in Melbourne’s CBD

A small group of Catholics joined thousands of protesters in Melbourne last Saturday to oppose a controversial new bill that has already been passed by one house of Victoria’s Parliament. Likened to the 1933 Enabling Act that facilitated Hitler’s rise to power, the proposed Victorian bill would, in the name of public health, give the Premier a range of sweeping powers, including the authority to detain citizens for up to two years.

“Mum, I have something to tell you and you won’t like it.”

Before 2021, a phone conversation that began that way might have led to a parent being told that their teenager had written off the family car. Or that someone close to them had conceived a child out of wedlock. But this is 2021, and parents must be prepared to hear of alarming new disappointments.

“I went and got the shot and now I have pains in my heart.”

Many thanks to the courageous Monica Smit for agreeing to do this email interview with me for The Remnant.

Monica is an Australian freedom-fighter who was arrested on charges of incitement last month in Melbourne, Victoria. Unable to accept the draconian bail conditions imposed on her by the courts, Monica chose to remain behind bars as a political prisoner. She was released following a successful appeal in the Supreme Court but will return to face her charges in November.

Men and women of my generation were taught to respect police officers: we knew that the police would help if we found ourselves lost or if our homes were broken into. We relied on them to direct traffic after a car accident but we knew we deserved their attention if we drove a little too fast or ran a red light.

Monica Smit has been released from prison after 22 days in isolation. Monica had initially chosen to remain in custody after the courts tried to impose unreasonable bail conditions when she was arrested on charges of incitement. Those charges relate to two anti-lockdown protests which took place in August during Melbourne’s extended lockdown. 

Editor's Note: Full article is forthcoming with more details on the updates below. Many thanks to our Australian correspondent, Kathy Clubb, for her courageous journalism. MJM

Over the last eighteen months, Australia has become a battleground for the opposing forces of freedom and totalitarianism. Some states have endured multiple, ongoing lockdowns and experimental vaccines have been mandated in many industries across the nation. At the Federal level, both the government and opposition are attempting to introduce vaccine passports while our Bishops have openly encouraged Catholics to accept the abortion-tainted vaccines. Add to this a new law that enables police to take control of private social media accounts and electoral changes that could see the end of minor parties, and it becomes obvious that Australia is in quite a mess.

Videns civitatem flevit super illam[1]

Every serious Catholic on the planet is by now aware of the Pope’s recent Motu Proprio which is designed to severely restrict access to the Latin Mass. For Catholics in Australia, the timing of the document’s release could not have been worse, as many traditionalists were among the 18,000,000 Australians then living under COVID stay-at-home orders and so were unable to access the sacraments or to seek solace in their parishes.

Our distress, like that of traditional Catholics everywhere, has been acute and many have questioned the lack of consultation preceding such an impactful document. This can be contrasted with, say, the 18-month discernment process surrounding as insignificant a change as the rebranding of the Global Catholic Climate Movement[2] - which has been renamed the Laudato Si’ Movement, in case you were wondering. The authoritarian decree with its harsh and demanding tone left us wondering what could possibly come next.

Most Bishops are irked by their being expected to act as executioners of a Papal decree that seems to many (including fair minded liberals) to be heavy handed and even brutal. - Fr. "X", Australia

Catholic educators should have little excuse to stray from the clear guidelines set forth by the magisterium. For example, Pope Leo XIII wrote that in Catholic schools, the Faith “is to be preserved, whole and entire”.[1] In this same encyclical, he also asked that parental freedom be respected. Pope Pius XI taught that “ that there can be no true education which is not wholly directed to man’s last end...:”[2] And it was Pope Paul VI who said that parents are the “primary and principle educators” of children and that teachers are only the “partners” of Catholic parents. [3] How disappointing it was, then, to learn of the new curriculum being trialled by Parramatta Diocese in New South Wales, Australia - the content of which poses a significant threat to the faith of its students and which is deliberately being kept from parents.

The draft programme is endorsed by Bishop Vincent Long and was released in a limited fashion in February of this year. Bishop Long gained notoriety during Australia’s 2017 referendum on marriage equality when he voiced his support for same-sex ‘marriage.’ In 2019, Bishop Long’s teachers were given a document on LGBTI resources which lists books by the dissident Fr James Martin and websites such as the Global Network of Rainbow Catholics. As if to confirm the heterodox agenda, the Diocesan Facebook page is littered with posts from Cardinal Tagle, Archbishop Gregory Wilton, calls for ‘integral ecology’ and posts about a recent workshop on Centering prayer.

According to the introductory section of the draft curriculum, it is based on what its creators refer to as a “transformation” model that “puts the personal learning growth of young people at the centre.” This model favours process over content and is Pope Francis’ preferred system of education. It echoes the Pope’s “head, heart and hand” approach to learning, which is a hallmark of his pedagogy and which underpins his Global Education Pact.

The transformation model has its basis in the work of the Jesuit Bernard Lonergan, a theologian who was an associate of Karl Rahner. He was known to have disagreed with the Church’s teaching on contraception[4] and he also promulgated the doctrine of Immanentism.[5] This is the heresy which teaches that the truth can be found within man, rather than revelation needing to be handed down by the magisterium. It is, as Dr. Dennis Q. McInerny, explained, “recklessly subjective”, replacing the true God with “a fiction of one’s own devising, a pseudo-being having its source nowhere else but in the demands of deep-set emotions.”[6]

The curriculum was authored mainly by theologian Anthony Maher. Maher is a proud  Modernist who wrote a book defending the excommunicated Jesuit, George Tyrrell, in which he slams Pope Pius X’s encyclical Pascendi for its “vitriolic language, personal threats, and the projected images of narrow-mindedness [which] represent the death rattle of Neo Scholasticism.”[7] Ironically, Maher’s draft curriculum is promoted as being structured in the tradition of St. Thomas Aquinas, but its contents bear little resemblance to the work of the Angelic Doctor. Rather, it reads more like a litany of the very errors condemned by Pius X.

Maher and FaggioliMaher with brother-in-arms Massimo Faggioli

In praising the new curriculum, Bishop Long says that Catholic schools should provide a Catholic education for all[8] which explains one of the core principles of this course: it is designed to cater to non-Catholics. Its creators have done an admirable job in that regard, as there is little that would offend a non-Catholic’s sensibilities.

This attempt to placate non-Catholics is known as ‘Receptive Ecumenism” a term that does not exist in pre-conciliar - or even conciliar - documents. It was coined in 2008, in response to the self-confessed ineffectiveness of the ecumenical movement. This updated form of ecumenism dispenses with the idea of evangelisation; Catholics should no longer promulgate Catholic teaching but rather, should “listen to the other”. According to the draft document, the concept of Receptive Ecumenism will be introduced at the Grade 3 level along with the principles of dialogue, encounter and interfaith relations.

The course includes what has sadly become the norm for Diocesan Catholic schools: sloppy catechesis on sin, which has been substituted for the reminder that people sometimes make “wrong choices.” The topic of evil is covered in Grade 6 under the heading of “mystery, myth and metaphor”, a title which does not inspire confidence in its ability to convey the objective reality of satan and his iniquitous works. Liberation theology also makes an appearance in Grade 6, which is somewhat unsurprising given Anthony Maher’s predilection for this heresy.[9]

Another clear heresy contained in the course is that of indifferentism, which was condemned by Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos.[10] The outline for Grade 3 states that “in God’s plan of salvation, there are a variety of different beliefs and pathways to God.” This statement, which is the theme for the module, is the very essence of indifferentism; the same module states that “holiness is open to all people of good will.”

The course contains a heavy emphasis on indigenous Australian spirituality. Grade 5 children are to be taught that “the Dreaming”, which is an important part of Aboriginal spirituality, has relevance for their everyday lives. One of the learning outcomes for Grade 6 children is that they will “receive insight from Indigenous Peoples with regard to Spirituality and Care of our Common Home.”                                                

Perhaps the most concerning aspect of the course for parents in our contemporary societal climate is its emphasis on sexuality, specifically in relation to same-sex attraction and transgenderism. In an August 20 newsletter to the Cathedral parish[11], the Dean and Administrator, Fr Peter Williams, sought to reassure parents that these topics are covered only at the grade 10-11 level, but this is simply not the case.

According to the draft curriculum, children as young as ten are expected to learn that “respect [for] sexual identities is an essential attribute to human flourishing and to “recognise sexuality as an exploration in forming personal identity as a prerequisite for human flourishing”. Children are encouraged to question whether or not sexual identity is a result of nature or nurture and whether sexuality is “optional.” The lesson plans for Grade 6 (eleven year olds) will be discussing how to recognise an authentic life partner - note that this is not restricted to a spouse, much less to a partner of the opposite sex.

Thankfully, some are speaking out publicly against the new curriculum. Latin Mass chaplain for the Wagga diocese, Fr Terence Mary Naughtin OFM,Conv. told LifesiteNews that the word, “inclusion”, which features prominently in the programme, effectively means “compromising the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ in order to accommodate sinful lifestyles” and should be rejected.[12]

Additionally, two priests, Fr John O’Neill and Fr John Rizzo, wrote responses to a Daily Telegraph article, slamming the new programme. Fr O’Neill wrote that the Catholic Education Office has no authority over parish schools and that he has placed a ban on use of the course in his school.

Fr Rizzo, who was subsequently summoned to the Parramatta Chancery, wrote to “ …  remind the Catholic Education Office of Parramatta of their crucial responsibility in teaching their students of the importance of the 10 Commandments; likewise the Catholic teachings of morality, especially in regards to the Church’s teachings on proper relationships, marriage between a man and a woman; abstinence before marriage; the evils of pornography; the love of purity; the avoidance of homosexuality…”

The Diocese of Parramatta would be wise to put the breaks on this draft curriculum which is causing so much consternation. It contains outright heresy, as well as enough ambiguity to make the authors of the conciliar documents blush. In promulgating indifferentism, liberation theology, indigenous spirituality, sexual deviance and gender theory, this programme will feed some of the worst aspects of Modernism to our most vulnerable minds whilst simultaneously denying them the fullness of the beauty of our Catholic Faith.













Page 4 of 5